As Africa launches its Continental Free Trade Area (CFTA) on 21 March in Rwanda at an extraordinary Summit of the African Union, the most important priority must be to ensure good content and quality. This is to avoid launching an empty or redundant CFTA.
The CFTA promises enormous benefits and welfare gains by doubling intra-Africa trade, but this will all depend on how good the deal is and how soon it takes effects. Africa is the last stronghold of poverty on earth, with some of the worst human development indicators.
As one of the 12 flagship programmes under the AU’s Agenda 2063, the CFTA is a key test of the determination of Africa to work resolutely towards achieving an integrated, peaceful and prosperous continent by 2063. Africa must, therefore, get it right.
The CFTA will include trade in services, which is of huge strategic importance for Africa. Services already contribute on average to more than 50 per cent of the GDPs of African countries. Services constitute key enablers for development, such as communication, transport, banking, insurance, energy, education, and health.
Services are high growth areas, such as tourism and construction. In many cases, it is all that young professionals have for earning a living, namely, their skills. The idea of entrepreneurial universities, where course work and dissertations should result in commercialisable ideas and business propositions, rather than just paper degrees at graduation, will need vibrant services markets.
There is an increasing body of literature suggesting that services will provide new pathways for Africa towards social economic transformation. In their recent book “The Unexplored Potential of Trade in Services in Africa”, Grover and Dihel demonstrate how trade in services is providing much-needed employment and incomes and contributing towards social economic transformation.
What will be required soon, however, is to go beyond the framework of rules and disciplines that have been agreed in the Protocol, and identify the services sectors in which to create an African integrated services market and in which to attract investment. This would be followed by sector regulatory frameworks and trade and investment terms and conditions, and creating awareness about these trade and investment opportunities.
Clear considerations can assist the identification of the initial group of services sectors, to target infrastructure services; services already liberalised autonomously or in the regional economic communities; services already opened up at the WTO; and high growth sectors for job creation. On these criteria, the following few services could be initially prioritised: communication, tourism, banking, transport, and energy.
Education, health and construction services are just as important and can be put in a second phase to follow soon. The good news is the Single African Air Transport Market was launched and a protocol on movement of persons concluded last month, which provide an early harvest in services. In the area of trade in goods, the main approach to market opening or tariff liberalisation will be the linear cut.
What is required now is to agree on a periodic percentage cut, preferably a transparent common approach. Before this is agreed, there will be no tariff reduction schedule. However, bilateral tariff negotiations will be a supplementary modality.
Bilateral negotiations could be complex in terms of multiple partners to negotiate with and uncertain haggling over specific tariff lines. It will be important to keep the number of negotiation partners to a minimum where possible, through negotiating as groups; and to set a fairly short timeframe for completing the negotiations.
The other thing to be addressed is the figures for sensitive and excluded products. Both these categories will cover 10 per cent of total product lines — about 600 products. But how many of these can be designated as excluded or sensitive, is the question to be discussed and answered now.
It is important to promote and grow regional value chains, including in agro-processing, chemicals, and automobiles; as well as the services and logistics inputs, which constitute up to 60 per cent of the value of final products. In order for this policy space and flexibility not to undermine intra-Africa trade, a cap on a maximum value of imports to be covered by excluded and sensitive products should be set.
Africa on the whole trades on few product lines and therefore the CFTA would be redundant if the most traded products were excluded. To bring the CFTA into effect sooner than later, it is important to agree on rules of origin that can quickly kick in.
Agreeing on a general cross-cutting minimum threshold for value addition, say in the range of 20 to 40 per cent, and a maximum one for non-originating material in the range of 60 to 80 per cent, will greatly facilitate the commencement of the CFTA in earnest, while work on change in tariff heading and product specific rules continues. For this as well, there should be a timeframe, though experience shows that it is a long painstaking exercise that can take years.
A critical consideration in agreeing on thresholds or finalising product specific rules of origin, is to promote production of and trade in inputs and other intermediate products within Africa, towards “Made in Africa”, while fully recognising the reality of global sourcing of some inputs for “Made in the World” products.
And lastly, it would be appropriate if Africa’s Heads of State and government turned up in large numbers. The CFTA is a milestone which will permanently change the economic geography of Africa and indeed the very narrative about the continent. —The writer is Comesa director of Trade and Customs